<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bibliography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>refracting theory: politics, cybernetics, philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Le Cazals</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-3016</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Le Cazals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 21:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-3016</guid>
		<description>You have miss Alain Beaulieu&#039;s Deleuze and phenomenology (a PhD done under Badiou critic). It is an important book because Beaulieu underlines that the Outside is not the open and he goes against the Badiou&#039;s reading of Deleuze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have miss Alain Beaulieu&#8217;s Deleuze and phenomenology (a PhD done under Badiou critic). It is an important book because Beaulieu underlines that the Outside is not the open and he goes against the Badiou&#8217;s reading of Deleuze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kieran</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>oh, i forgot.  Zourabichvili wrote his magnum opus on Spinoza, &quot;Spinoza and the physics of thought&quot;, you might look at that. it&#039;s not too hard to get on french amazon. 
down the road, if i get time to read it in the spring, i might even consider translating it. we&#039;ll see. gueroult&#039;s books are more important as far as the history goes...we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, i forgot.  Zourabichvili wrote his magnum opus on Spinoza, &#8220;Spinoza and the physics of thought&#8221;, you might look at that. it&#8217;s not too hard to get on french amazon.<br />
down the road, if i get time to read it in the spring, i might even consider translating it. we&#8217;ll see. gueroult&#8217;s books are more important as far as the history goes&#8230;we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kieran</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>both Land pieces are memorable, but the Thanatos one is probably one of my all time fav essays, even if i don&#039;t ultimately agree with him, which is second to the pleasure of reading his work at all. 
if you read french, macherey&#039;s &quot;hegel ou spinoza&quot; is something i&#039;ve wanted to read for a long time. 
dunno, there&#039;s lots. have you looked at Conway&#039;s &quot;nietzsche  and the political&quot;? it should speak to many of the topics you&#039;ve been posting on lately.

ps. we need to assemble a list of possible translation options for Claire. let&#039;s be in touch in the next couple day about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both Land pieces are memorable, but the Thanatos one is probably one of my all time fav essays, even if i don&#8217;t ultimately agree with him, which is second to the pleasure of reading his work at all.<br />
if you read french, macherey&#8217;s &#8220;hegel ou spinoza&#8221; is something i&#8217;ve wanted to read for a long time.<br />
dunno, there&#8217;s lots. have you looked at Conway&#8217;s &#8220;nietzsche  and the political&#8221;? it should speak to many of the topics you&#8217;ve been posting on lately.</p>
<p>ps. we need to assemble a list of possible translation options for Claire. let&#8217;s be in touch in the next couple day about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Tirupati Rao</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Tirupati Rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 05:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>can philosophy become art?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can philosophy become art?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor27</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Which Nick Land? The Shamanic Nietzsche or the one on Death? I have a lot of his essays in my archive if you want any. By the way, with your knowledge of French texts and our shared common interests, do you have any suggestions for the bibliography (including your suggestions on Simont and Gueroult, etc., which I&#039;m still in the process of adding here). I&#039;m definitely only started in collecting texts together, but you seem to have a really unique perspective on contemporary theory. I&#039;ll be sure to include these questions in my email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Nick Land? The Shamanic Nietzsche or the one on Death? I have a lot of his essays in my archive if you want any. By the way, with your knowledge of French texts and our shared common interests, do you have any suggestions for the bibliography (including your suggestions on Simont and Gueroult, etc., which I&#8217;m still in the process of adding here). I&#8217;m definitely only started in collecting texts together, but you seem to have a really unique perspective on contemporary theory. I&#8217;ll be sure to include these questions in my email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kieran</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/bibliography-for-current-projects/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>that nick land piece is a personal favorite of mine. glad to see someone else enjoyed it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that nick land piece is a personal favorite of mine. glad to see someone else enjoyed it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
