Comments on: Full Translation of the Dictionary of Non-Philosophy http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/full-translation-of-the-dictionary-of-non-philosophy/ refracting theory: politics, cybernetics, philosophy Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:00:32 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Chris http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/full-translation-of-the-dictionary-of-non-philosophy/#comment-3149 Chris Sun, 15 Nov 2009 07:12:52 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=1075#comment-3149 Excellent work Mr. Adkins. I'm certain that this will be or great use to many people... including (I am not ashamed to say) myself. Excellent work Mr. Adkins. I’m certain that this will be or great use to many people… including (I am not ashamed to say) myself.

]]> By: Joseph Weissman http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/full-translation-of-the-dictionary-of-non-philosophy/#comment-2893 Joseph Weissman Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:44:02 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=1075#comment-2893 I find myself struggling with/wondering about this question as well. Taylor, any thoughts on this? (Gorgeous image, by the way.) I find myself struggling with/wondering about this question as well. Taylor, any thoughts on this?

(Gorgeous image, by the way.)

]]> By: Kate http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/full-translation-of-the-dictionary-of-non-philosophy/#comment-2847 Kate Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:08:37 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=1075#comment-2847 In keeping with the above post, I confess that I was able to decipher some of the text after about ten hours, at which point I came to the preliminary conclusion that Laruelle is "simply" haha! trying to mathematize philosophy--not in the sense of using actual mathematics, but in the sense of de-intentionalizing its content. But why did he need to use so much jargon? So this statement would seem to be itself mathematical and devoid of "decision" ? In keeping with the above post, I confess that I was able to decipher some of the text after about ten hours, at which point I came to the preliminary conclusion that Laruelle is “simply” haha! trying to mathematize philosophy–not in the sense of using actual mathematics, but in the sense of de-intentionalizing its content. But why did he need to use so much jargon? So this statement would seem to be itself mathematical and devoid of “decision” ?

]]> By: Robyn McMaster http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/full-translation-of-the-dictionary-of-non-philosophy/#comment-2785 Robyn McMaster Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:47:46 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=1075#comment-2785 Thanks, it's about time philosophy was shared with all rather than having a few who deem themselves wise narrow it to a few by using a language that defies understanding. Complexity, if not expressed in simplicity is lost. Thanks, it’s about time philosophy was shared with all rather than having a few who deem themselves wise narrow it to a few by using a language that defies understanding. Complexity, if not expressed in simplicity is lost.

]]> By: Joseph Weissman http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/full-translation-of-the-dictionary-of-non-philosophy/#comment-2784 Joseph Weissman Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:50:01 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=1075#comment-2784 Great work, sir! Great work, sir!

]]>