Comments on: Noises

By: Janet M. Pendergraft

Janet M. Pendergraft — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:42:00 +0000

Check out “Dualism” connoted “co-eternal bi-nary opposites defaulted through “Materialistic monism.”

By: Janet M. Pendergraft

Janet M. Pendergraft — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:35:29 +0000

God blesses true believers through eternity.

By: Janet M. Pendergraft

Janet M. Pendergraft — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:31:48 +0000

Let God be God. In changing God, God becomes you. God cancels out. Can you manage the universe and all life through time and space. God manifests through your actions. One in all. All in one.

By: Janet M. Pendergraft

Janet M. Pendergraft — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:24:24 +0000

Let God be God. In changing God, he/she becomes you. Can you manage the universe and all human form through physical and spirit existence? He/she only asks that you think all good thoughts because he/she battles with the dark side for the welfare of the cosmos, and all its inhabitants. The omnipotent Godhead manifests with you. One in all. All in one.

By: Josh W

Josh W — Thu, 14 May 2009 13:19:27 +0000

Hmm, the desire to subvert desires… Are you talking about bribing someone to not do what they want because you will give them means to do what they want? The endlessly deferred opportunity, that is an investment in the present without ever having present realisation? ‘Cause that sucks!

Also this problematization reminds me of reflexive self organisation; where the judgement of a system as acceptable/unacceptable is made by it’s components, and as with Kant, because they act as both ends and means, the whole exhibits teleology. This is reminiscent of Hofstader’s strange loop also!

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 13 May 2009 18:53:55 +0000

Sorry for my imparsiblility, and thank you, this clarifies your meaning. Swarm logic is not a logic of mutual cancellation. The latter was just my initial misreading. There’s a unique structural similarity and profound difference between our “studies” of reality–wow, truly striking!

Parasites are a key in my understanding as well, though I haven’t read Serres, Deleuze or Guattari.

“But aren’t you just reinventing the wheel?.”

–There is a strange kind of wheel that can only be reinvented.

You might soon find a post on our (non)equivalences in the chance that perhaps you will find interest in my ideas, in connecting with a point that’s not on the map–although there’s an equal chance you will find only lunacy

By: Joseph Weissman

Joseph Weissman — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:41:49 +0000

Thank you so much! –I’m having trouble parsing your question: are you suggesting the new predators are perhaps “not simply more powerful” — or that they are perhaps “not simply parasites”? There’s certainly no law that says a parasite cannot be chased out a relatively weaker parasite (in a sense, this is closer to a “universal”); rather the formula given above is an attempt at a statement of the irreversibility of swarm logic: once you’ve gotten rid of one, inevitably — it would seem — the horde follows…

By: Kate

Kate — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:29:34 +0000

Wow, interesting and poetic, a “transvaluation” that Nietzsche would have predicted. Your style is wonderful. A question: perhaps more powerful parasites are not simply more powerful parasites?