<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Non-)Epistemology and Ontology: Three more definitions from Laruelle&#8217;s Dictionnaire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/non-epistemology-and-ontology-three-more-definitions-from-laruelles-dictionnaire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/non-epistemology-and-ontology-three-more-definitions-from-laruelles-dictionnaire/</link>
	<description>refracting theory: politics, cybernetics, philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/non-epistemology-and-ontology-three-more-definitions-from-laruelles-dictionnaire/#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=736#comment-2439</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Taylor! As always, these translations are awesome and much appreciated! Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Taylor! As always, these translations are awesome and much appreciated! Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Adkins</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/non-epistemology-and-ontology-three-more-definitions-from-laruelles-dictionnaire/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=736#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>Hello Michael! Thanks for your comment, I&#039;m glad to be of service. As for right now, I have an agreement with repress to send in to Cosmos and History (an online journal associated with them) an excerpt from the first chapter--I&#039;d love to do the whole first chapter, but it&#039;s 43 pages in the French, and I think they&#039;re looking more for a 5-8000 word piece. Anyway, if that excerpt goes well and they decide to publish in the journal they will want to proceed with the whole book. I have just asked for the rights to a chapter of the book and/or the whole book depending on the above. Oh, the book in consideration is called Philoisophie et non-philosophie (1989), one of his more systematic accounts of non-philosophy.

On the other hand, I have emailed Miguel de Beistegui about Laruelle&#039;s Princips de la non-philosophie (1996), his self-proclaimed most important work. He is the editor of Palgrave&#039;s Forum for French Philosophy which is dedicated to publishing translations of untranslated French philosophers. I should be hearing back from him soon on this possibility. Other than that, my friend Sid and I are pursuing the publication of his essay on Deleuze with a suitable journal. I&#039;ll be sure to post when something interesting occurs.

All the best,

Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Michael! Thanks for your comment, I&#8217;m glad to be of service. As for right now, I have an agreement with repress to send in to Cosmos and History (an online journal associated with them) an excerpt from the first chapter&#8211;I&#8217;d love to do the whole first chapter, but it&#8217;s 43 pages in the French, and I think they&#8217;re looking more for a 5-8000 word piece. Anyway, if that excerpt goes well and they decide to publish in the journal they will want to proceed with the whole book. I have just asked for the rights to a chapter of the book and/or the whole book depending on the above. Oh, the book in consideration is called Philoisophie et non-philosophie (1989), one of his more systematic accounts of non-philosophy.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have emailed Miguel de Beistegui about Laruelle&#8217;s Princips de la non-philosophie (1996), his self-proclaimed most important work. He is the editor of Palgrave&#8217;s Forum for French Philosophy which is dedicated to publishing translations of untranslated French philosophers. I should be hearing back from him soon on this possibility. Other than that, my friend Sid and I are pursuing the publication of his essay on Deleuze with a suitable journal. I&#8217;ll be sure to post when something interesting occurs.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeloneillburns</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/non-epistemology-and-ontology-three-more-definitions-from-laruelles-dictionnaire/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeloneillburns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=736#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>thanks for posting this, the hard work of translation is appreciated. any news on a full length laurelle translation coming out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for posting this, the hard work of translation is appreciated. any news on a full length laurelle translation coming out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
