Comments on: Difference, Primacy and Peace: Deleuze and Levinas http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/difference-primary-and-peace-deleuze-and-levinas/ refracting theory: politics, cybernetics, philosophy Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:04:27 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Taylor Adkins http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/difference-primary-and-peace-deleuze-and-levinas/#comment-2307 Taylor Adkins Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:37:07 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/?p=641#comment-2307 You know, this may be a long shot, but how does Totality and Infinity stand in relation to the countersignifying regime, that is, the nomad? Does calling into question the ipseity of the self not bring into play the nomad? Or, in a different dimension, what does Levinas say about the home, about being at home (chez soi), questions of political economy, nomads against the state, etc. On the other hand, what about Deleuze and Guattari's claim that only the primitive regime knows of the other (citing anthropology and ethnology)...an investigation needs to be done in order to find out the relationality/status of the other in the nomadic regime... You know, this may be a long shot, but how does Totality and Infinity stand in relation to the countersignifying regime, that is, the nomad? Does calling into question the ipseity of the self not bring into play the nomad? Or, in a different dimension, what does Levinas say about the home, about being at home (chez soi), questions of political economy, nomads against the state, etc.

On the other hand, what about Deleuze and Guattari’s claim that only the primitive regime knows of the other (citing anthropology and ethnology)…an investigation needs to be done in order to find out the relationality/status of the other in the nomadic regime…

]]>