<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simondon and the Machine: Technology, Individuation, Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/</link>
	<description>refracting theory: politics, cybernetics, philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Individuating - Word of the Day</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator>Individuating - Word of the Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/#comment-2581</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;&#8230;Simondon writes that perception is always the resolution of a conflict.&#8221;   &#8220;&#8230;a new conceptual model for understanding reality, in terms of the process of individuation.&#8221; From: Fractal Ontology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;&#8230;Simondon writes that perception is always the resolution of a conflict.&#8221;   &#8220;&#8230;a new conceptual model for understanding reality, in terms of the process of individuation.&#8221; From: Fractal Ontology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor27</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/#comment-866</guid>
		<description>You write: 
&quot;The pre-individual field is called “pregnant” in its intensity with the potential for individuation.&quot;
One thing to note: in chapter one of Psychic and Collective Individuation, Simondon refers to forms that are pregnant, not necessarily to the pre-individual field. We should probably discuss what he means, and if this notion can also be applied to the pre-individual field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write:<br />
&#8220;The pre-individual field is called “pregnant” in its intensity with the potential for individuation.&#8221;<br />
One thing to note: in chapter one of Psychic and Collective Individuation, Simondon refers to forms that are pregnant, not necessarily to the pre-individual field. We should probably discuss what he means, and if this notion can also be applied to the pre-individual field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor27</title>
		<link>http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/simondon-and-the-machine-technology-individuation-reality/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe, great work here. 
I am impressed at the broad portrayal of Simondon. Even with such a limited amount of resources! I have a book by Pascal Chabot on Simondon&#039;s philosophy, and he has a chapter on Simondon and Marx. I think this was one of the fundamental questions you were always interested in hearing about in relation to Simondon. I&#039;ll try to see about getting some of it translated for you to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe, great work here.<br />
I am impressed at the broad portrayal of Simondon. Even with such a limited amount of resources! I have a book by Pascal Chabot on Simondon&#8217;s philosophy, and he has a chapter on Simondon and Marx. I think this was one of the fundamental questions you were always interested in hearing about in relation to Simondon. I&#8217;ll try to see about getting some of it translated for you to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
