Comments on: Notes to Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: Rhizome, Chapter 1 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/ refracting theory: politics, cybernetics, philosophy Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:04:27 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Hyperlink fractology « rhizomeworld http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/#comment-3162 Hyperlink fractology « rhizomeworld Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:49:18 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/#comment-3162 [...] Posté en Uncategorized par petejeffs à décembre 6, 2009 Here is the link to [...] [...] Posté en Uncategorized par petejeffs à décembre 6, 2009 Here is the link to [...]

]]> By: Ephémère et pérenne « Sédiments http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/#comment-3090 Ephémère et pérenne « Sédiments Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:15:32 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/#comment-3090 [...] Image : Fractal Ontology [...] [...] Image : Fractal Ontology [...]

]]> By: manav http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/#comment-3056 manav Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:32:35 +0000 http://fractalontology.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/notes-to-deleuze-and-guattaris-a-thousand-plateaus-rhizome-chapter-1/#comment-3056 "...A rhizome is made of plateaus—Gregory Bateson defines a plateau as: “a continuous, self-vibrating region of intensities whose development avoids an orientation toward a culmination point or external end”..." But is not a rhizome flat, without depth and devoid of any kind of layering? Perhaps another way to 'see' a rhizome is to think in terms of instant-intensities of forces. No layering...no depth...flat and turbulent! I must also add...thanks for all the resources...especially the ones on Laruelle...particularly, I want to thank you (and your collaborators) for making the Dictionary available so freely. Cheers! “…A rhizome is made of plateaus—Gregory Bateson defines a plateau as: “a continuous, self-vibrating region of intensities whose development avoids an orientation toward a culmination point or external end”…”

But is not a rhizome flat, without depth and devoid of any kind of layering? Perhaps another way to ’see’ a rhizome is to think in terms of instant-intensities of forces. No layering…no depth…flat and turbulent!

I must also add…thanks for all the resources…especially the ones on Laruelle…particularly, I want to thank you (and your collaborators) for making the Dictionary available so freely.

Cheers!

]]>