So the primary question should not be about space: yes there are auxiliary sources of energy, but the question of self-organizing spaces only makes sense in relation to the individual in a metastable pre-individual field. Otherwise you have to bring it to the questions of state geometry and overcoding (but that’s not your question)–or is it, because it could relate to the question of a sedentary distribution in a closed space, and a nomadic distribution in open space. What are the irreversible processes of evolution, of individuation? How does using up a quantity of energy reduce the individual’s potential for new actualizations? What are the coefficients of folding in relation to the individual’s harnessing of the pre-individual field?

What is the nanometric (quantum) level of time to the individual; or, (like Serres–the difference between an instant, three seconds, and billions of years to understand the formation of the universe), in what ways can we conceive (non-metrically) the irreversible catastrophes (events of individuation) that serve as the strongest benchmarks for the stages of the individual’s becoming (for example, embryogenesis and the phases of division and apoptosis for the planned obsolescence of certain cells for the ability for the being to more highly differentiate the body, or the phases of gestation (into trimesters)). In other words, what do the phases look like in their production and variation (temporally), or in their expressions as symptoms of different (de)formations caused by the symbiotic relation of the individual to its milieu and other (possibly) parasitic beings?